Solid Work You Mob Are Doing: Case studies in Indigenous Dispute Resolution & Conflict Management in Australia

Description

This report presents the research findings of an in-depth investigation into effective practices for managing conflict involving Indigenous people as part of the Indigenous Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management Case Study Project. The research was commissioned by the National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC) and conducted by the Federal Court of Australia in collaboration with the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. The project conducted ‘snapshot’ studies and three main case studies: a mediation at Halls Creek, Western Australia; a mediation carried out by a NSW Community Justice Centre in a NSW south coast town; and the work of the Tiwi Youth Diversion and Development Unit in managing family and community conflicts on Bathurst Island, Northern Territory. This report identifies a number of critical factors for effective practice which are designed to assist practitioners and others involved in the design and delivery of a dispute management process, and examines the need for various kinds of support, without which effective practices cannot be realised.

Copyright Information

The copyright for this resource belongs to the Commonwealth of Australia. Inquiries about using or reproducing this resource should be directed to the Federal Court of Australia. As stated in the body of the resource (summarised): The views and opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Court of Australia, the case study partner organisations or members of the Project?s Research Consultative Group or Reference Group. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Federal Court of Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and will not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. References to services or programs in this report should not be taken as an endorsement by the Federal Court of Australia of those services or programs. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher and the authors.