|Source/Publisher||eLaw journal : Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law Special Series (1) 2006| 101-129|
|Subjects||Courts and sentencing, Criminal justice system|
Aboriginal Sentencing Courts are not generally understood as ‘therapeutic jurisprudence’. This essay explores a particular Aboriginal Sentencing Court – the Shepparton Koori Court – from its establishment through its first two years of operation at a time when the author was the inaugural Koori Court magistrate in the north east region of Victoria. It is suggested that this court was broadly and particularly representative of therapeutic jurisprudence principles for all involved in its operations. It is not suggested that this court provided a ‘medicalised’ jurisprudence, but rather a healing culturally sensitive approach, across cultures. Shame, articulation, conversation, dialogue and the incorporation of Aboriginal people’s viewpoints all deliver therapeutic jurisprudence in ways little understood by judicial officers and other ‘black letter’ law theorists who remain committed to mechanical, inflexible and rigid notions of the separation of powers/independence of the judiciary.
© 2006 Murdoch University. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of it may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior permission of the publisher, Murdoch University.